Changeset: 61384178
cycling-related corrections along Via Tommaseo in Padova
Closed by voschix
Tags
created_by | JOSM/1.5 (13996 en_GB) |
---|---|
source | local knowledge; all available satelllite photos; GPX tracks; Mapillary |
Discussion
-
Comment from SekeRob
Hi,
Something changed on the Padova residential area to cause it a highlight in QA in Dec-2022, where the east side park has somehow incurred a duplicate segment ring (residential inner role passes between hospital and park) and self intersection which you already corrected.
Before correcting the duplicate inner role issue, the fixme on this residential area relation is now 4 years old. Ready to put it in vertical archive or just move it to an informational note or description tag as it continues to flag on anyone's OSMI report that touches this zone.
For your understanding JIC you unlikely don't already know, other readers might not, non 'residential' areas inside a larger residential zone don't need any role assignment of inner/outer. Hospitals, schools (like Don Bosco), parks, farmland, apartment complexes, gated communities, sports areas all render 'over' residential zones exactly the same as buildings do.
Anyway, it seems there's inconsistency in mapping what's inner and what not, one park is the other is not, one school is, the other is not etc.
Let me know and I'll put the area on my plan of attack list, not compromising the main outline as it is now.
ciao
-
Comment from voschix
Ciao, it's not a question of rendering, it's a question of data. A large hospital is not a residential land use. Farm land is definitely not residential land. The present rendering approach is a trick by the authors of the renderers to make the map rendering work. My main issue with that specific large landuse=residential polygon is that it is simply to big to handle. If you want to work on it, I would suggest to split it in smaller areas and using mainly major roads and waterways as splits.
I simply don't have the time to do this well. I may also have aggravated the problem by changing some land uses. In particular I recently added a missing bit of the Azienda Ospedaliera (western part) that was missing.
Volker -
Comment from ivanbranco
Ho cominciato a sfoltire un po', siamo passati da 81 membri a 54.
-
Comment from voschix
Come detto, penso che sia meglio di spezzare la relazione in poligoni più piccoli. Non so a che cosa serve una relazione che contiene un solo mega landuse=residential per la città .
Ways (1-20 of 33)
- 1
- 2
- 614292126, v1
- 614292128, v1
- 614292129, v1
- 614292130, v1
- 614292131, v1
- 614292132, v1
- 614292133, v1
- 614292134, v1
- 614292135, v1
- 614292136, v1
- 614292137, v1
- 614292139, v1
- Via Luigi Piccinato (30318632), v11
- Via Enrico Berlinguer (30318634), v13
- 75620048, v5
- 75620072, v2
- Padiglione 15 (131997592), v5
- 149009758, v4
- 169832743, v4
- Via Carlo Goldoni (178126703), v7
Relations (1)
- 5810974588, v1
- 5810974589, v1
- 5810974590, v1
- 5810974591, v1
- 5810974592, v1
- 5810974593, v1
- 5810974594, v1
- 5810974595, v1
- 5810974596, v1
- 5810974597, v1
- 5810974598, v1
- 5810974599, v1
- 5810974600, v1
- 5810974601, v1
- 5810974602, v1
- 5810974603, v1
- 5810974604, v1
- 5810974605, v1
- A (5810974606), v1
- 5810974607, v1
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |