Changeset: 6996238
Naturskyddsområden i Falu kommun.
Closed by AndersAndersson
Tags
created_by | JOSM/1.5 (3701 sv) |
---|
Discussion
-
Comment from user_5359
Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/95487620/history. What is the meaning of the foreign tags
_CATEGORY_ 0
_COUNTY_ 20
_DID_ 801064
_FROM_DATE_ 2000/03/10
_ID_ 2009489
_MUNICIPALI_ 2080
_OBJECTID_ 2591962
_PROTECTION_ 5
_TOTALAREA_ 2.959400000000000
_UPDATE_ 2010/11/07
? -
Comment from AndersAndersson
It is values from imported nature reserves.
For example _OBJECTID_= 2591962 is the identity of that specific boundary imported from government data.
It has a value when the imports will be updated. But there is no value to make it an OSM tag and there is no corresponding OSM-tag that is suitable.
So just leave it as it is. -
Comment from user_5359
It is now standard to note the reference to the source under the key ref. For better classification, this key should also be adapted in case of modifications.
All other non-OSM keys can also be added via the ref key if required and should no longer be included in the OSM dataset. -
Comment from AndersAndersson
The changeset you are commenting on is 12 years old.
I have learnt a few things since then, and OSM has also changed a lot during this time.What is it you want to achieve? If it bothers you that those tags is not mentioned in some kind of list you know of, just forget it and move on to something else where you actually have a chance to improve the map.
If you think the extra tags takes up space in the database, you removing it will take up even more space with the next versions of the polygons.---In general, not related to this changeset---
Sorry for being a bit harsh, but I'm fed up with people focusing on that everything shall be according to some rules they think applies, and in the armchair mapping process moving forward as a road roller and destroying surveyed information just because it isn't 100% correct.
What is considered correct has changed a lot during the years OSM has existed. If we would have removed instead of improved what is not at that moment 100% correct we would not have as good map as we have today.
Ways (1-20 of 38)
- 1
- 2
- 95487598, v1
- Biotopskydd 2006:394 (95487602), v1
- 95487607, v1
- Biotopskydd 1999:409 (95487620), v1
- 95487625, v1
- Biotopskydd 2006:1326 (95487626), v1
- Biotopskydd 2006:919 (95487630), v1
- Vattenskyddsområde (95487636), v1
- Biotopskydd 2006:920 (95487648), v1
- Biotopskydd 2000:153 (95487657), v1
- 95487663, v1
- Biotopskydd 2001:355 (95487665), v1
- Vattenskyddsområde (95487671), v1
- Biotopskydd 1997:750 (95487688), v1
- 95487695, v1
- Biotopskydd 2008:3490 (95487697), v1
- Vattenskyddsområde (95487703), v1
- Biotopskydd 1998:522 (95487713), v1
- Vattenskyddsområde (95487719), v1
- Biotopskydd 1998:441 (95487740), v1
Relations (1)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |