Changeset: 87149662
Removing the proclamation boundary relation of Green Mountain National Forest based on discussion in talk-us. Proclamation boundary is not verifiable on the ground, and encompasses private land which isn't protected like the rest of the national forest
Closed by deleted
Tags
created_by | JOSM/1.5 (16538 en) |
---|---|
source | Mapbox Satellite |
Discussion
-
Comment from Adam Franco
Hi @ppjj, I just want to file a note that I don't believe that a consensus has been reached on the "proclamation boundaries" for national forests. While they aren't sign-posted on the the ground, they are as verifiable as other governmentally decreed boundaries (like state/county lines).
I'm not proposing that this boundary removal be reverted at this time, but recognise that a tagging scheme isn't yet solidified. This boundary may be appropriate to restore, but as a boundary=national_park or other tagging that doesn't include the incorrect protect_class=6.
On the affirmative side, removing this outer boundary makes the parcel-level rendering MUCH more easy to see and interpret, especially when near the proclamation boundary. :-)
Cheers,
Adam
Ways (2)
Relations (1)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |