Changeset: 108556136
Finish München Augsburg Radweg. First bigger edit. Feedback welcome
Closed by elbotho
Tags
changesets_count | 8 |
---|---|
created_by | iD 2.19.6 |
host | https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit |
imagery_used | OpenStreetMap (Standard);.gpx data file |
locale | de |
review_requested | yes |
source | https://www.lra-ffb.de/mobilitaet-sicherheit/radln-im-landkreis/radtourismus/radwandern/muenchen-augsburg-radweg-mar |
Discussion
-
Comment from ToniE
Great work and I did sort and fix gaps in the route - a pain in the ... with iD (the browser based editor).
BTW: is there a way back, i.e. many cycleway alongside a road are oneway for bicyle. So for the way from A - M, cyclists should use the opposite cycleway of the road
Did you check the License and Copyright issue? "Kostenlos" does not mean: "OSM can use it". Could you check for copyright notes on the source-URL, and Baynernets, ...
The creator is http://www.outdooractive.com/r/42450051
Worst case: we have to delete the data/relation
Br
Toni -
Comment from ToniE
... except: you did the tour by bicycle, following the guideposts along the trip.
I.e. "ground-truth", you have been there and seen all the stuff.
-
Comment from elbotho
Thank you very much for the feedback and closing gaps!
I should probably go for JOSM then?I only rode part of it so far, so yes I relied on the GPX track on https://www.lra-ffb.de/mobilitaet-sicherheit/radln-im-landkreis/radtourismus/radwandern/muenchen-augsburg-radweg-mar
which does not state a license.
I was pretty confident since I consider a recorded GPX track not reaching the threshold of originality and many other Radlland Bayern/Baynernets routes are on OSM already.
To make sure I'd have to get them to license it under a free license, yes?
Might be easier to ride it completely :DYou are correct, there is also "a way back" that probably differs. I'll have to look into the relevant tags for that.
-
Comment from ToniE
> I should probably go for JOSM then?
mid- and long-term, I'd suggest using JOSM. This has some learning curve though.
> To make sure I'd have to get them to license it under a free license, yes?
Yes, always make sure, we have the right to use the data ...
Information from e.g. Bayernatlas.de must not be used at all ... except their "Bayern (80 cm)" aerial images as background for editing.If in doubt about the license: don't use a source.
OSM allows using our data for any purpose (commercial or not), only requires to state the origin of the data.
Many "open data" sources (CC-BY-*) require the same, but this cannot be supported by OSM.
We would habe to put their names into the e.g. right bottom corner of e.g. osm.org ... which would fill half of the screen - not good.> I'll have to look into the relevant tags for that.
At "Odeonsplatz, Munich" there is short stretch for both directions ... using 'role' = 'forward' for the particular ways.
Best edited with JOSM though, it has a small graphical part in the relation-editor which shows gaps, ...I can give a short online-intro into that, sharing my screen on Jitsi server of FOSSGIS (the German chapter of OSM).
Ways (12)
- 967213989, v1
- Spickelstraße (967213990), v1
- 967213991, v1
- Ablaßweg (967213992), v1
- 967213993, v1
- Gröbenbachstraße (967213994), v1
- Gröbenbachstraße (23044217), v19
- Ablaßweg (35202568), v6
- 69874891, v7
- 245171742, v23
- 508233735, v5
- Spickelstraße (519217957), v3
Relations (3)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |