Changeset: 87835264
Updated details of the Wells Road/St Johns Lane intersection. There may be a better way to represent this whilst keeping the pedestrian islands. I am getting a comment that says the pedestrian areas are disconnected from other roads. Not sure how to solv
Closed by Dave Drury
Tags
changesets_count | 673 |
---|---|
created_by | iD 2.17.3 |
host | https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit |
imagery_used | Bing aerial imagery |
locale | en-GB |
review_requested | yes |
source | local knowledge |
warnings:disconnected_way:highway | 1 |
Discussion
-
Comment from ndm
I think using some only straight-on / only turn-left/right might simplify the restrictions.
The traffic lights on Bing streetside *mostly* seem to have "->" arrows in various directions.
-
Comment from Dave Drury
Sorry if I have complicated this. So what is the best way to represent the junction. Should I get rid of the extra roads that I have introduced and just use the straight-on / only turn-left/right rather than restrictions. I guess the reason that I used the extra roads was due to the presence of the pedestrian features in the map (one of which was already there. Keen to help but don't want to undo others' good work.
Ways (9)
- Wells Road (825008113), v1
- Saint John's Lane (825008114), v1
- Wells Road (825008115), v1
- 825008116, v1
- 646600760, v2
- Saint John's Lane (646600763), v2
- Saint John's Lane (646600764), v3
- Saint John's Lane (824077913), v2
- Wells Road (824077916), v2
Relations (6)
Nodes (20)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |