Hello Pieter,

do you have the scripts for generating those statistics somewhere? I would be interested to do another round of analysis…

~Jonathan

Nice work and blog post. I had a look at “my area” and there are quite some roads missing the “maxspeed” tag. Especially in the more rural villages.

Impressive work and nice visualizations :)

On an iPhone you could use GoMap!!. It’s a really nice editor and I find it pretty intuitive.

@tg4567: I don’t think the chart would look that much difference. Organic Maps had 3k unique users in 2021 and 6,5k in 2022, see this table. Surely only a part of them are new OSM users…

So German users view 3x as many tiles per visit on osm.org compared to US-american users.

RU and UA a bit higher that I expected. Thats maybe connected to sanctions (unavailability of other map providers) and all those “war maps” using OSM tiles…

Danke :)

Bayern/Franken ist was Hausnummern angeht leider recht schlecht aufgestellt. Es fehlt glaube ich eine offizielle Quelle von der man importieren/abzeichnen darf. Deshalb siehts außerhalb größerer Städte oft mau aus…

I map many stuff but thinking about my specialization I would say: campgrounds with group_only=yes (the brown ones on OpenCamingMap) :)

Coole Idee, tolle Umsetzung und Respekt fürs fleißige “Buchstabensuchen”!

I’m using Organic Maps for a while now on my phone and I pretty like it as map. Its less “bloated” compared to OSMAnd.

Yesterday I tested the integrated editor in Organic Maps and I have to say, that I like the opening hours part. So lets hope that the dev community around stays alive :)

I guess. So I will create a PR there…

Danke für das Engagement in diesem Bereich! Ich hab mein persönliches Tagging schon daran angepasst :)

Eine Baustelle sind noch die Tagging Voreinstellung, die u.a. von ID verwendet werden: https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/blob/main/data/presets/tourism/camp_site.json

Da wird aktuell noch capacity verwendet, müsste man dann in die drei Subtypen spliten. Dann aber von Fields nach moreFields verschieben, sonst wirds zu unübersichtlich…

I don’t think we should move from “capacity” away. It is a widely used (1M) key (most of them in other contextes) but it’s known to the mappers.

I look through the classes of a group_only campsites mapper and user as well. Capacity as of persons is a pretty nice tag when search for a camp site for the next groups summer camp.

Is there a real world utilization of maxtents information apart from backside camping?

support

Oh interessantes Feature. Hat mich direkt motiviert ein, zwei Ausrufezeichen weg zu editieren :P

Bei group_only Zeltplätze ist die Taggingsituation und das Auffinden durch OpenCampingMap auf jeden Fall besser geworden. Danke dafür!

From what I’ve seen in Texas they are quite good. There is a wiki site about it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Microsoft_Building_Import_-_North_Central_Texas

Maybe you could talk with https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Andrew%20Matheny He seems to be the driver behind this effort.

Nice work. I justed mapped some buildings in Rochelle Park: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65485624

Are you aware of the building footprints Bing provides to OpenStreetMap to use? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/US/BingBuildings

Hab ich heute entdeckt: https://www.qwant.com/maps/place/osm:way:591410013@ehemalige_Fasanerie#map=14.69/50.9838084/11.3559523

Qwant Maps, die benutzen scheinbar nur OSM Daten. Für ne Alpha Version find ich das schon ziemlich beeindruckend. Und die Nennung von OSM ist gerade bei POI sehr gut sichtbar :)